A Secret Weapon For rule of merger criminal case law pakistan
refers to a landmark case decided through the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. Here’s a brief overview:کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
Therefore, this petition is found to get not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as the petitioners may seek out remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
Some bodies are supplied statutory powers to issue steering with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, like the Highway Code.
It is currently very well-settled that considerations for pre-arrest and post-arrest bail are absolutely different, therefore, in our view the learned Judge experienced fallen in error to cancel the bail allowed to petitioner with the same Additional Sessions Judge.”
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, It is usually a well-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.
In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty for that accused who intentionally murdered the victim.
There are many cases where death was never supposed – even more where All those nominated from the FIR were not present when the injury or death occurred. The death of the human being is often a tragic event. Though the death of any dwelling being is not any fewer a tragic event.
Usually, only an appeal accepted via the court of very last vacation resort will resolve these kinds of differences and, For several reasons, this kind of appeals tend to be not granted.
In simple terms, the section states that any person who commits intentional murder shall be subjected on the death penalty or life imprisonment, along with a possible fine.
In the event the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC might dismiss here the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a possibility to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is generally only performed When the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. While in the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence along with the petitioner company responded for the allegations therefore they were nicely mindful of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use for being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
this Court is still left with no option but to direct the respondents to notify the promotion of your petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)
Section 489-File from the Pakistan Penal Code pertains to offenses involving copyright currency notes and coins. Its primary objective will be to suppress counterfeiting activities and maintain the sanctity in the national currency.
fourteen. While in the light of your position explained earlier mentioned, it can be concluded that a civil servant provides a fundamental right being promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be thought of for no fault of his own and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency in the duration of service or from the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Read more